Research Project



Planul National de Cercetare, Dezvoltare si Inovare - PN II, Program: IDEI, Nr. 196/1.10.2007; Cod CNCSIS: ID_950

THE ENTREPRISING FIELD AND HIS ROLE IN THE MITIGATION OF THE REGIONAL DIFFERENCES. CASE RESEARCH - GORJ COUNTY

Manager project: Ph. D. Cristian Braghina
Last update
24.Apr.2010



Abstract

 
The gradual diappearance of the regional diferences represents, with no doubt, a major chalenge for the european organism. The territorial differences represent a potential source of instability, particularly because there is the fear that the existent economical polarization can become a social polarization, the potential source that could amplify the antagonisms which threatean the system’s stability. The inequality of the geographical development, represents mostly the social inequality between the different types of economical activities and the socioprofesional ones, inequality that divides the geographical area depending on power criteria. The regional differences are only the result of the structural disfunctions of the economical and social systems, who need to human involvemet to reduce the inequality of the geographical development.

The main goal of this project, unfolded on three year’s time, is the preparation of a developement model for the Gorj district who will contribute to outline the future directions regarding the decrease of the territorial differences in the sight of the european integration through the stimulation of the enterprising itiatives.

The project is beeing justified by the necessity of a sistematical approaching of the national territory as the only way of identifying the means through which the evolution of an administrative unit can be supervised. The most important objectives of this project are: the indentification of the connections between the enterprising initiatives and the local developement, the proportion between the local developement and the most favorable distribution of the geographic area, as well as the achievement of a theoretical model for analizing the proportion between the enterprising initiatives and the geographic areas’ structure. The relation between the enterprising initiative and the functional structure of the geographic area will be examined from the point of view concerning the changes that arise at the level of the territorial system components and the connections between them, together with the founding of the small and middling enterprises as a result of the enterprising initiatives.

The identification of the territorial differences is realized through a complex of methods amongst which the concentration degree (specialization) of some activities, which provide precious information regarding the level of economic development, the evolution and rythm of the economic increase as well as the specific of the region. The main indicators used at the present are: the location coefficient, the location grade, the grade of spatial partnership and the mobility of the spatial activities.

The project’s concern is to offer a scietific support to the local and central authorities, with proper documentary evidences concerning the developement of the enterprising initiative in this area, and on this basis to give concrete solutions based on a succession of decissions that in the end will diminish the teriorial differences. In the same time, the project can offer a clear image of the territorial constituent parts in need of support in order to encourage the development.

Project research staff

 
 
Number
Name and surname
Year of birth
Academic/scientific position
Doctoral degree
1
Braghina Cristian
1955
Professor
Yes
2
Ianos Ioan
1950
Professor 
Yes
3
Talanga Cristian
1954
Professor 
Yes
4
Peptenatu Daniel
1974
Assistant professor
Yes
5
Zamfir Daniela
1974
Assistant professor
Yes
6
Draghici Cristian
1977
Teaching Assistant
Candidate
7
Pintilii Radu
1979
Researcher 
Candidate


Staff members’ degree of involvement

 
         Member of the team *
 
Tasks
 
Braghina Cristian
 
Ianos Ioan
 
Talanga Cristian
Young researchers
Peptenatu Daniel
Zamfir Daniela
Draghici Cristian
Pintilii Radu
First activity from
first objective (2007)
yes
 
 
 
yes
yes
yes
Second activity
from first objective (2007)
yes
yes
yes
 
 
 
 
First activity
from second objective (2007)
yes
yes
 
yes
yes
yes
yes
Second activity
from second objective (2007)
yes
 
 
yes
 
 
 
First activity
from first objective (2008)
yes
yes
yes
yes
 
 
 
Second activity
from first objective (2008)
yes
 
 
 
yes
yes
yes
Third activity
from first objective (2008)
yes
 
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
First activity
from second objective (2008)
yes
yes
yes
yes
 
yes
yes
Second activity
from second objective (2008)
yes
 
yes
yes
 
 
 
Third activity
from second objective (2008)
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
First activity
from third objective (2008)
yes
 
 
 
yes
yes
yes
Second activity
from third objective (2008)
yes
yes
yes
 
 
 
 
First activity
from first objective (2009)
yes
yes
yes
yes
 
 
 
Second activity
from first objective (2009)
yes
 
 
 
yes
yes
yes
Third activity
from first objective (2009)
yes
 
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
First activity
from second objective (2009)
yes
yes
yes
yes
 
yes
yes
Second activity
from second objective (2009)
yes
 
yes
yes
 
 
 
Third activity
from second objective (2009)
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
First activity
from first objective (2010)
yes
 
 
 
yes
yes
yes
Second activity
from first objective  (2010)
yes
yes
yes
 
 
 
 
First activity
from second objective (2010)
yes
yes
yes
yes
 
yes
yes
Second activity
from second objective (2010)
yes
 
yes
yes
 
 
 
 
 
 


Objectives and activities and the degree of fulfillment

 
Year
 
Objectives
(Objective’s name)
 
Associated activities
Degree of fulfillment
2007
1
Identifying the links between entrepreneurial initiative and local development
Analysis of the body of documents and the available volume of data
Total
 
Formulating the directions for work and the exact steps to take
2
Analysis of the links between local development and improvement of the territorial organization
Analysis of local and regional development policies and their role in case of Gorj county
Total
 
Highlighting the features of potential use in rehabilitating/developing the economic base of local communities
  
  
  
  
2008
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
1
Identifying the disparities across the land in Gorj county by means of a SWOT analysis that would assess strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and the risks of integrated development of human settlements in Gorj county
Identifying relevant indicators (demographic indicators, economic indicators, infrastructure indicators, living standard indicators) and analyzing them
Total
 
Aggregating individual indicators
Individualization and analysis of privileged areas, underprivileged areas and severely underprivileged areas
2
Analysis of the role of foreign and local investments in creating business environment and entrepreneurial culture
Identification of the distribution of investments, using information collected from local or regional authorities and the respective economic agents
Total
 
Analysis of the evolution, origin, volume and structure of investments
Multi-criteria classification of the influence of investments in the area under analysis and neighbor areas
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
2009
1
Assessing the way communities that benefit from foreign and local investments can become secondary growth poles, and creating a model for local-scale action to attract investments of that type
Identifying the secondary hubs of growth and the scope of their influence.
Total
 
Establishing and analyzing the relations between investments and local and regional development
2
Acquaintance with the SME sector’s evolution at the level of Gorj county settlements
Collection of data from local and regional authorities.
Total
 
Drafting fieldwork forms for local officials, economic agents, and other sections of the population
Field research to correct existing information and collect new information
3
Identifying changes that occurred in the region as a result of the development of entrepreneurial initiatives
Selection of the system of indicators
Total
 
Diagnosis of the socio-economic status at the level of administrative units
Analysis of the relations between the hierarchical position of human communities and capitalization of local and regional economic resources
2010
1
Creating a model for theoretical analysis of the ties between entrepreneurial initiatives and the functional organization of the geographical space
Submitting medium- and long-run strategies for the development for rural and urban areas
Stage in progress
Collating a consistent material that could help focus local development policies, considering all factors involved
2
Disseminating the results among local administration’s representatives and the academia
Attendance of various scientific local and regional events
 Stage in progress
Publication of a volume synthesizing the results of research


  
  
Articles published

 
 
  
A. Contributions to the scientific approach to the concepts of entrepreneurial initiative and geographical disparities
         Identifying the links between entrepreneurial initiative and local development in the land;
         Analysis of the ties between local development and improvement of geographical space organization;
         Assessing the way communities benefiting from foreign and local investments can become secondary hubs of development, and creating a model for local action to attract investments of that type;
         The role of the business community in creating development hubs;
         The evolution and impact of the SME sector in urban and rural communities;
         Identifying changes that occurred in the territory as a result of the development of entrepreneurial initiative.
 
B. Applied concepts
         Treating the problems related to severe underdevelopment as emergencies;
         Identifying disparities across a region in Gorj county – the system of parameters used to identify the disparities comprises four categories: state of demographics, state of the economy, infrastructure and living standards; all four are deemed as having an equal influence on development;
         Supporting partnerships sealed by secondary development hubs and neighbor administrative subdivisions, with the goal of encouraging entrepreneurial initiative;
         Laying the scientific foundation for policies and intervention in downsizing territorial disparities at medium- and micro-scale level;
         Shortening the time it takes to implement the policies to diminish the effects of underdevelopment;
         Approaches to underprivileged areas.
 
 
Other articles published

 
  
1.     Articles published in ISI journals
Braghina C., Peptenatu D., Constantinescu S., Pintilii D., Draghici C., (2010), The Pressure Exerted on the Natural Environment in the Open Pit Exploitation Areas in Oltenia, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol.5, nr.1, pg.33-40, ISSN 1842-4090,  http://www.ubm.ro/sites/CJEES/viewTopic.php?topicId=72;
Ianos I., Peptenatu D., Zamfir D., (2009), Respect for envinronment and sustainable development, Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, vol.4, nr.1, pg.81-94, ISSN 1842-4090,  http://www.ubm.ro/sites/CJEES/viewTopic.php?topicId=72;
 
 
2.     Articles published in journals included in BDI
Peptenatu D., Pintilii R., Cepoiu L., Draghici C., (2009), Polycentric development strategy- an efficient instrument in administrative descentralization, Revista Romana de Geografie Politica, nr. 2/2009, ISSN 1454-2749, pg. 99-111, http://rrgp.uoradea.ro/index_files/2009_2.htm;
Ianos I., Braghina C., Peptenatu D., Zamfir Daniela, Cepoiu Loreta, Pintilii R., (2009), Geographical analysis of the higher education infrastructure in Romania, Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Geographia, LIV, nr. 1/2009, ISSN 1221-079X, pg. 19-34, http://www.studia.ubbcluj.ro/arhiva/cuprins_en.php?id_editie=392&serie=GEOGRAPHIA&nr=1&an=2009;
Ianos I., Zamfir Daniela, Peptenatu D., Pintilii R., (2009), Theindividualisation of discontinuities in deeply disadvantaged   areas of Romania, Romanian Review of Regional Studies, vol. 5, nr. 2, pg. 3-10, ISSN 1841-1576, http://geografie.ubbcluj.ro/cgr/index.htm;
 
3.Others
Peptenatu D., Talanga C., Pintilii R., (2008), Rolul sectorului antreprenorial in tratamentul ariilor profund dezavantajate, Comunicari de Geografie, vol. XII, ISSN 1453- 5483, pg. 355-358;
Braghina C., Peptenatu D., Zamfir D, Nae M. (2009), Le developpement du secteur entrepreneurial et les management des disparites territoriales. Etude de cas: le Departement Gorj, Annals of Valahia University, Geogr. Series, Tom VIII, ISSN 1582- 6198, pg. 169-176;
Braghina C., Draghici C., Peptenatu D., Pintilii R., (2009), Rural changes in the restructuring minig areas within Gorj county, Annals of Valahia University, Geogr. Series, Tom VIII, ISSN 1582-6198, pg. 151-158;
Braghina C., Peptenatu D., Draghici C., (2009), The function of policentric development in the refinement of weakly polarised areas. Case study: Gorj county, Geographica Timisiensis, vol. XVII, nr. 1-2/2008, ISSN 1224-0079, pg. 45-53;
Peptenatu D., Pintilii R., Draghici C., Stoian D., (2009), Accentuarea disparitatilor teritoriale din Romania in conditiile crizei economice mondiale, GeoPolitica – Revista de Geografie Politica, GeoPolitica si GeoStrategie, Anul VII, nr 29 (1/2009), Edit. Top Form, Bucuresti, ISSN 1583-543X, pg.165-172;
Braghina C., Peptenatu D., Draghici C., (2008), Socio-economic restructuring of the mining areas of Gorj county, Human Geographies-Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geographies, vol. 2, Issue 2, ISSN 1843- 6587, pg.18-26,  http://humangeographies.org.ro/2_2_nov_2008.htm;
Braghina C., Peptenatu D., Draghici C., (2009), - The Reorganization of Economic Activities and the Perspectives of the Endogenous Development in the Mining Areas from Gorj County, Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, vol. 1/2009, ISSN 1314-2420, pg. 85-94,  http://www.jurareview.ro/.
 
Other results achieved

 
 
 
Attendance of national and international conferences:
Talanga Cristian, Peptenatu Daniel, Stoica Valentina, Structurarea functionala a ariilor profund dezavantajate din judetul Gorj, A 8-a Conferinta internationala Cohesion and Disparities. Regional and local development in Central and south-Eastern Europe between Potentials, Policies and Practices, Timisoara, mai 2008;
Peptenatu, Braghina Cristian, Iancu Cristina, Stoica Ilinca Valentina, The management of area weakly polarized throughout innovations and good usage. Case study: Gorj County, Romania; Moravian Conference on Rural Research EURORURAL `08 : Investigating European Countryside, Brno, Cehia (August 25 - 29, 2008);
Peptenatu Daniel, Stoica Ilinca Valentina, Iancu Cristina, The dynamical reorganization of the rural areas in territories deeply disadvantaged. Case study: The south-western region;Moravian Conference on Rural Research EURORURAL `08: Investigating European Countryside, Brno, Cehia (August 25 - 29, 2008);
Peptenatu Daniel, Ilinca Valentina Stoica, Pintilii Radu, The economic and demographic characteristics of deeply disadvantaged areas in the South-West region of Romania; Geographical Environment And Cross-Border Cooperation Within The Lower Basin Of The Danube, Craiova, (2-5 octombrie 2008);
Braghina Cristian, Peptenatu Daniel, Draghici Cristian, Rolul dezvoltarii policentrice in tratamentul ariilor profund dezavantajate, A 8-a Conferinta internationala Cohesion and Disparities. Regional and local development in Central and south-Eastern Europe between Potentials, Policies and Practices, Timisoara, mai 2008;
Braghina Cristian, Peptenatu Daniel, Draghici Cristian, Rural changes in the restructured mining area from Gorj County; 23rd Session of PECSRL – The Permanent European Conference for the study of the Rural Landscape: “LANDSCAPES, IDENTITIES AND DEVELOPMENT”, Lisabona/Óbidos, Portugalia (1-5 septembrie 2008);
Braghina C., Talanga C., Zamfir Daniela, Role of the entrepreneurial sector in the regional development. Case study – Gorj County in cadrul conferintei UnderStanding and shaping Regions: Spatial, Social and Economic Futures”, organizata de Regional Studies Association, Leuven-Belgia, 6-8 aprilie 2009;
Peptenatu D., Cepoiu Loreta, Stoica Valentina, Analysis and Management of the Poorly Polarized Areas in Oltenia, in cadrul conferintei UnderStanding and shaping Regions: Spatial, Social and Economic Futures”, organizata de Regional Studies Association, Leuven-Belgia, 6-8 aprilie 2009;
Braghina C., Zamfir Daniela, Talanga C., Cepoiu Loreta, Le role des poles secondaire de croissance dans l’attenuation des disparites regionales. Etude de cas: Le departement de Gorj, in cadrul celui de-al III-lea Colocviu international romano-algeriano-francez “Directions contemporaines dans l’etude du territoire. La gestion du territoire, des aleas et de la ville.” Organizat de Universitatea din Bucuresti, Universitatea M’sila si Universitatea Paris Est, 27-31 mai 2009, Bucuresti.  


Stage 2007

Objectives for 2007:

1. Identifying the relationships between the entrepreneurship initiative and local development

The entrepreneur concept is highly debated in specialized economic studies, especially after 1990, where its role in speeding up the local economy is being highlighted. As defined by law 133 from 199, the entrepreneur is person or a firm, which by associating with another person or firm, organizes a company with the purpose of conducting lucrative activity, by creating goods and services, or by selling them under competition laws.

The entrepreneurship initiative is defined as a complex of actions coordinated by a main idea which aims to develop an economic activity.

For the current phase of research in territorial modeling, theories of regional development are mostly representative and have a broad applicability. We are talking about the theories of localization (theories based on transport cost, based on the independence of localization, based on interregional exchanges), theories of regional growth (growth polls theory), unequal growth theory (center – periphery relationship, circular and cumulative causal theory, and endogenous development theory (regional decline theory, long cycle of regional development theory).

Identification of the territorial discrepancies is done by using a complex of methods among which the degree of concentration (specialization) of some activities which offer valuable information regarding the level of economic development, the evolution and the economic growth rate as well as the specific of the region. The first attempt of economic and social growth of settlements severely struck down by the industrial restructuring, and massive layoffs, is constituted by the delimitation of areas severely damaged, named by the official paper unfavorable areas.

According to the provision of paragraph 1 of the Government ACT no 24/1998, by unfavorable area we understand a geographical area, strictly highlighted from a territorial point of view, which fulfills one of the following conditions:

- the unemployed percentage in total workforce of the area is at least three times as large as the percentage of unemployed in the total workforce at national level, within the last 3 months preceding the date of the drawing up of the papers

- there are isolated areas, with no means of communication with a poorly developed infrastructure.

Article 141, Paragraph 1, of the Government Act 24/1998 stipulates that all firms working in such areas are exempted from paying any profit tax corresponding to new investments, until reaching the maximum state help intensity mentioned the Law of State Aid, and its subsequent modifications.

In Gorj county three such areas were declared:

- Albeni, through GA. no 191/1999

- Schela- GA no192/1999

- Rovinari - GA no 193/1999

The main advantage given to the investors in such areas are the fiscal facilities valid up to period of 10 years. The Treaty of Ascension to the EU, Appendix VII, provides for such areas a transition period: for the companies who have received the status of permanent investor before 1st of July 2003, Romania can provide exemptions from profit tax as provided by GA no 24/1998 regarding the unfavorable region regime, by respecting the following conditions: the state aid is given for regional investments; the net intensity of such aids cannot exceed 50% of the total aid give. This level can be increased by 15% for small and medium sized enterprises.

2. The relationship between local development and the optimization of the geographical area.

The slow disappearance of the regional differences constitutes, without any doubt, a major challenge of European construction. Regional differences represented a potential source of instability, especially taking into account the fear the economic polarization can turn into social polarization, potential source of amplification of differences that threaten the system. Spatial development inequality is mostly social relationship inequality between various strata of economic and socio-professional activities, inequality which triggers a hierarchy of the area based on domination type of relationships. The regional differences are the results of structural disfunctionalities of the economic and social system, upon which there is the need to intervene in order to reduce the inequality of spatial development.

The appearance of entrepreneurship in a geographical space, the dynamic and differentiated distribution depends of various factors, such as: entrepreneurship culture, managerial culture and geographic area resources.

In geographic areas with economical differences, entrepreneurship has an important role, regarding its field of activity.

The relationship between the entrepreneurship and the functional structure of the geographic area is obvious due to transformations of territorial systems, one with the appearance of small and medium companies as a result of entrepreneurship.

There are 2 types of relationships between the entrepreneurship and the local development: direct and indirect, which will be analyzed related to the way the geographic area transforms.

These relationships are influenced by the type of environment: urban or rural. In the urban area, the high density of population and higher income led to the development of small and medium companies, especially in the services area. From here, the entrepreneurship spirit has propagated towards the urban areas, towards settlements on the circulation axis, especially towards small and middle size towns, and finally towards rural settlements, with low accessibility.

The regional economic model represents the conventional simplified image of a region or geographical area which needs to be analyzed, a logical or mental construction which portrays the essential elements and their relationships, with the purpose of discovering new relationships, and establishing strategies and policies to ensure a balanced growth of the region. Starting from the simplified models with theoretical value and which do not take into account the variables which may influence the development of the region, we have evolved to present complex model, based on influences exterior to the region, model which highlight the reactions of the region to outside stimuli.

The general level of economic development constitutes the primary explanation for the distribution and concentration of the regional entrepreneurship initiatives. Furthermore, the evolution of several factors specific to each area (historical, social, cultural, political, environmental), can help or not the distribution of economic activity. During econometrical analysis they tested a hypothesis according to which when the general level of economic development is high, or the economic growth rate is high, there are more chances that the economic activities are distributed more uniformly. One study (Jula, Jula 1998), which tested such a model from Romania from an econometrical point of view, shows that in the long run (1950-1996) regional unbalances care negatively correlated with the level of economic development; moreover this correlation is maintained both during economic growth and decline.

In the analyzed area it is very obvious how the entrepreneur sector becomes fundamental for the development of a geographical area. This analysis gives the local and central authorities a well documented scientific basis regarding the development of entrepreneurship at a regional level, and also solutions based on decisional chains with a purpose of reducing regional differences. At the same time it gives a clear picture of the regional components which need support in order to foster development.

The results of the research will have an economic and social impact because they shed new light on the entrepreneurship initiatives, in the sense of local development.

Stage 2008

Introduction. The following issues have been approached in the annual stage (2008) of the present project: identification of the territorial disparities in the Gorj County within the policy of regional development in Romania; role of the investments in creating the business environment and entrepreneurial culture; identification of the human settlements acting as secondary growth poles in the Gorj County.

The policy of regional development is one of the greatest challenges of the European Union. One of its main objectives is the establishment of a legal and institutional framework able to decrease economic and social disparities. The special importance of the regional development is emphasized by the great share of the budget allotted to it (1/3 of the whole), distributed according to the solidarity principle (communitarian funds allotted to regions in economic decline).

The operationality of funds is guaranteed by the following principles:

a. planning;

b. partnership;

c. additionality;

d. monitoring, control, and assessment.

Romania has traced the lines of its regional development policy according to Law 315 of June 28, 2004 that defines regional development policy as the whole of the Government policies elaborated (through the bodies of public central administration) by the authorities of the local public administrations and by the specialized regional bodies after consulting the socio-economic partners involved with a view to: favoring an equilibrated and long-lasting economic increase and the social development of certain geographical areas constituted in development regions; improving Romania’s international competitiveness; and reducing the economic and social differences between Romania and the other EU member states. The regional development policies are enforced according to the general objectives and priorities of Romania’s development, but also to the UE objectives in the field of economic and social cohesion. The principles lying at the basis of fulfilling the regional development policy are: subsidiarity; decentralization, and partnership.

Identifying territorial disparities. Another major challenge is formulating a methodology able to identify and analyze regional disparities by a systemic approach at the level of the smallest administrative units so that the intervention of the decision factors can be as efficient as possible.

All the actions taken to implement a regional policy have as final goal the decrease of the gaps and disparities existing among various territorial units, otherwise considered to be relatively homogeneous. Four important stages can be distinguished in achieving this goal: accepting regional development policies; identifying and analyzing territorial disparities; defining regional development policies; implementing them.

Territorial disparities are identified and analyzed on the basis of the statistical indicators selected separately, for individualization and analysis, respectively. The former category includes the indicators selected to meet the goal of the study; they are able to grasp territorial reality better. The backing indicators are meant to reveal in detail the determinants of territorial disparities. The indicators have seen selected based on the correlation between development and entrepreneurial spirit.

The system of indicators used for identifying territorial disparities falls into four categories: demographic state; economic state; infrastructure; and living standard – each of them considered to equally influence the development.

Demographic state was appreciated as a function of three indicators: depopulation intensity, percentage of the over 60-year-old population, and vitality index as a ratio between the total population and the population having a fixed domicile.

Economic state was analyzed starting from five indicators: economic dependence; unemployment percentage in the active population; percentage of the population employed in agriculture in the total active population; percentage of the population employed in the total active population; and physiological density.

Infrastructure, an indispensable development element, was analyzed starting from a complex set of indicators including: the dwelling habitable surface, modernity of the road infrastructure (as a ratio between the length of the modernized streets and the total length of the streets); and the length of the water, sewerage and gas mains.

Living standard was quantified by a set of indicators grasping directly or indirectly the quality of life: percentage of the population working in agriculture in the total of the working population; habitable surface per inhabitant; net migration; and percentage of high school graduates in the total population.

Each group of indicators is illustrated by graphs drawn based on processing the data series offered by the statistical cards of the communes and towns between 1991 and 2005 or of the latest population census. Using a unitary methodology, the administrative-territorial units were ranked and classified from one to five, the highest values being used to emphasize the elements that finally shaped the deeply disadvantaged areas. By totaling these figures, synthesis maps have been drawn for the four categories of indicators (Fig. 1).
Demographic state Economic state
Infrastructure Living standard
Fig. 1. Deeply disadvantaged (blue and red), disadvantaged (yellow), and favored (white) areas in the Gorj County. A comparative synthesis of the four groups of indicators.

Source: processed data

The three disadvantaged areas officially named in 1999 by Government Decisions (Motru Rovinari, Schela, Albeni) were shaped as deeply disadvantaged areas. However, mention should be made that they extend to other neighboring communes but the towns Motru, Bumbesti Jiu and Tg. Carbunesti have been left aside as a consequence of a better general evolution of the urban centers versus the rural ones. The fourth area (the South-Eastern Area) is the largest one and meets the biggest territorial disparities.

Fig. 2. Deeply disadvantaged (blue and red), disadvantaged (yellow), and favored (white) areas in the Gorj County identified on the basis of the four groups of indicators: demographic state, economic state, infrastructure, and living standard.

Source: processed data

Role of the investments in development of local economies. Within the territorial system the entrepreneurial sector represents the most dynamic component since it structures the space it develops into by a more or less selective capacity of using the resources, by impact on the other components, and by creating new structures as well.

The entrepreneurial initiative is the distinct segment in creating an enterprise; it is the force that materializes the idea. This segment appears before the enterprise itself. Some of the natural questions that face the researcher are the incubation of the idea, the place, and the cause leading to the generation of an entrepreneurial initiative. Therefore: why, where and how does the entrepreneurial initiative appear?

In the case of the Gorj County, the entrepreneurial initiative is backed, theoretically at least, by the three zones being declared disadvantaged (Albeni, Schela, and Motru Rovinari). The analyses we have made show that the towns in these areas have undergone a slow development process, although superior to the other administrative-territorial units (communes) which are part of them – a fact that takes them out of the respective areas since they play the role of polarization centers.

Analysis of the total of the salaried people in these areas, in 1999–2005, shows an oscillating evolution, with about 25 – 30% being employed in the private sector.

In the communes in the deeply disadvantaged areas, the initiative for carrying on economic activities is limited to small units having a local interest – food industry and other units and services.

Therefore, in this territory, the endogenous entrepreneurial initiative has developed in a proper legal framework and the process can go on by turning to good account such favorable elements as: land resources, human resources, and energetic resources. The long-range plan of the Pirelli Company to amply invest at Bumbesti Jiu could increase the polarization function of the town and develop the northern area of the county as well.

Role of the entrepreneurial sector in establishing the growth poles
The entrepreneurial initiative is the consequence of the need to identify solutions for the problems existing in a community or to achieve certain targets the communities at varied spatial levels aim at. The way in which such initiatives appear is relatively simple: one starts from questions and reaches solutions.

The present evolution shows that almost all the entrepreneurial initiatives start from the low levels of the space structuring. In the Gorj County, such levels are mainly urban centers. They have to become genuine growth poles, in the context of the human and material resources they have at their disposal, but also considering the concept of polycentric development.

The key to such a development is every encouragement to set up and then to further develop small and medium businesses.

Conclusion: the entrepreneurial initiative changes the space structure it develops into by a more or less selective capacity of using resources, by impact on the other components, and by creating new structures as well.

Research Team

No. crt.NameYear of BirthTitlePh.D.
1.Ioan Ianos1950ProfesorYes
2.Cristian Talanga1954ProfesorYes
3.Daniel Peptenatu1974LectorYes
4.Zamfir Daniela1974LectorYes
5.Cristian Draghici1978AsistentDoctorand
6.Radu Pintilii1981CercetatorDoctorand






                                                Bibliography

Antonescu Daniela (2003), Dezvoltarea regionala în Romania, Oscar Print, Bucuresti;
Aydalot Ph. (1985), Economie regionale et urbaine, Ed. Economica, Paris;
Benito-Alonso M., Capron H., Goybet Ph. (2000), Disparites regionales, convergence reelle et cohesion europeenne;
Campbell C. (2000), Democratic Accountability and Models of Governance: Purchase/Provider/Owner/Tenste.Ethics în Public Sector for the New Millenium, Aldershot, UK, Ashgate Press.
Claval P., (1993), Initiation al la geographie regionale, Paris, Nathan;
Cooke P., Morgan K. (2000), The associational economy: firms, regiona and innovation, Oxford University Press, New York;
Dauphine A. (1999), Une theorie des disparites geographiques, RERU, 5;
De Figueiredo E.V.S. (1998), La methote statistique dans la definition de regions heterogenes dans des espaces geographiques, RERU, 4;
Friedman J., The Spatial Organization of Power în the Development of Urban Systems, Bourne&Simmons, Los Angeles;
Ianos I. (1997), Individualizarea si analiza disparitatilor intraregionale. Aplicatie la judetul Alba, Comunicari de geografie, II;
Ianos I. (2000), Sistemele teritoriale, Ed. Tehnica, Bucuresti;
Ianos I., (2000), Potentialul economic al teritoriului si dezvoltarea sectorului antreprenorial în Romania, Terra, 2;
Ianos I., Humeau Jean-Baptiste (2000), Teoria sistemelor de asezari, Ed. Tehnica, Bucuresti;
Jula D., Jula Nicoleta (1998), Dinamica dezechilibrelor în dezvoltarea regionala, Oeconomica, 3-4;
Lalatka R., Bishop J. (2000), Rolul incubatoarelor de afaceri în dezvoltarea economica. O prima evaluare efectuata în tarile în curs de dezvoltare si în tarile cu economie în tranzitie, Ed. All Beck, Bucuresti;
Ronstadt R.C. (1984), Entrepreneurship: Text, Cases and Notes, Lord Publishing, Dover;
Sandu D. (2001). Les engeux des réseux migratoires dans l’espace social de la transition – le cas roumain. Comunication soutenue à la Maison des Sciences de L’Homme. Paris. le 4e Avril


Stage 2009

 

Phase I
  
            Introduction. The main goal of the first phase of this project in 2009 was as follows:  Evaluating the way settlements receiving foreign and domestic investments can become secondary centers of development and drafting a model for local-scale action to attract investments of the above-mentioned type. In order to reach the target, the following activities were considered: identifying secondary enters of development and their areas of influence, identifying and analyzing the relation between investments and local and regional development.
 
            In spatial terms, development depends on a set of determining factors, which generate significant differences in the presence of production facilities – both quantitative and qualitative – differences in sector structure and the distribution of economic activities, as well as in social terms. These differences cause a gap and permanent competition between human settlements, which results in the creation of development centers and areas comprising several competing entities, which make up the polarized area.
Major imbalances can be identified in the region analyzed, caused by the drop in the “development” dispersion rate for numerous centers, which generated a chain of shocks in the subordinated areas, going beyond the critical threshold in many cases.
            According to law 351 /2001, Gorj county has two second-rank towns (Targu Jiu and Motru) and seven third-rank towns. According to traditional criteria, the county seat is a medium-sized city, at the higher limit of the 100,000-inhabitant bracket. Motru is also a medium-sized city, at the lower limit of the 20,000-inhabitant bracket, while all other towns are included in the small-town category, with less than 20,000 inhabitants. Notice should be made of the significant gap between Targu Jiu and the other towns (a 4.1 ratio).
            Analyses carried out at the level of administrative units by collating several demographic indicators, development growth rate and living standards highlighted secondary centers of development, relatively uniform in geographical distribution across the county, with the exception of the south-east, where the concentration rate is quite low.  
Granting the status of secondary center of development can – and should - be conditioned, alongside the other elements, by the value of domestic or foreign investments made both in the respective locality and in its area of influence.
Diversifying the economy of the region is a priority in the current context, as the economy is mono-specialized and in addition mining operations have fallen below normal values (the level in production that contributed to the development of the region until 1990 can no longer be reached). The entrepreneurial sector is the most dynamic element in the region; its development organizes and offers a structure to its enclosing areas, by means of its differentiated taking advantage of resources and the impact on the strength of relations among the other components of the system.
 
 
                                   Figure 1 The main areas of concentration
 
            Considering this economic setting features numerous drawbacks, one may conclude that an opportunity for new activities and jobs can be created by means of innovation.
            SME activity indicates an uneven distribution across the region and significant differences between urban and rural and northern and southern areas. Urban areas have around four times more SMEs per 1,000 inhabitants than rural areas; the cities of Targu Jiu and Motru make up for more than 60% of all SMEs in the county between them. There is a limited number of SMEs in the towns of Tismana, Turceni and Ticleni, while villages such as Arcani and Baia de Fier have a high number. The  least developed area in terms of the number of SMEs is the rural region to the south of the county, where the number of SMEs is less than 7 per 1,000 inhabitants and sometimes less than 4 per 1,000 thousand inhabitants (in Bustuchin, Negomir, Tantareni).
            There has been a significant drop in the ratio of medium-sized SMEs, with a rise in the ratio of small SMEs and micro-enterprises. According to National Trade Registry Office (ONRC) data, there were 21 large companies in activity with more than 30,000 employees in the county by 2005 (around 12.5% of the working population), the most important of them being the Oltenia National Lignite Company (around 10,000 employees) and the two major energy-generating complexes, Turceni and Rovinari (with a total of more than 8,000 employees).
Evaluating the geographical distribution of companies and their share capital highlights differences between the secondary centers of development, as well as certain similarities:
- the total number of companies varies inside a range going from 50 to more than 100, with most of them located in Motru, Bumbesti Jiu, Targu Carbunesti and Novaci;
- there is a concentration of companies in the northern half of the county, a situation favoured by the presence of natural resources, but especially by the polarizing capacity of the city of Targu Jiu, despite the higher demographic aging rate;
- the total value of the companies’ equity is low as compared to the situation in the main development center, the city of Targu Jiu;
- the highest values in company equity are registered among companies in Motru, Targu Carbunesti, Bumbesti Jiu and Novaci. The town of Rovinari is also included, due to the scope of mining there, although it is not included among secondary centers of development;
- a feature shared by all administrative units in the county – secondary centers of development included – is the vast preponderance (90%) of Romanian-capital companies; in terms of structure, the tertiary sector is predominant;
- the secondary sector makes up for 10% to 25 % of all companies in secondary centers;
- the size of the enterprises is conditioned by their field of activity, raw material resources, the level of technology, workforce training levels and existing demand from the market. Under the current economic conditions, microenterprises are dominant in the county.           
 
 
Figure 2 The number of companies
 
In the secondary centers of development, microenterprises make up for 60% to 75% of companies, with small and medium enterprises making up for the rest (Motru, Matasari, Ticleni, Turceni, Targu Carbunesti, Novaci, Baia de Fier, Bumbesti Jiu, Tismana, Pades). Mention should be made of the presence of these small and medium enterprises in the area of influence of these centers of development.
Foreign capital makes a limited contribution to investments. The geographical distribution and the ratio of foreign capital features high differences in villages and towns in the county.
The number of companies with foreign capital contributions by the end of 2007 ranged from 1 to 245. The highest number of companies is located in the county seat. The number of companies with foreign capital in the vast majority of administrative units ranges from 1 to 25. In this respect, one could say the county seat is excessively developed.
 
 
 
 
Figure 3 The structure of share capital in joint venture companies - urban areas (2007)
 
Among secondary centers of growth, most companies with foreign capital contributions are located in the cities of Motru (25), Bumbesti Jiu (24) and Targu Carbunesti (13). An important place is held by the city of Rovinari, with 25 companies with foreign capital contributions.
Foreign capital makes up for close to 100% in the equity of these companies in the case of the cities of Motru and Bumbesti Jiu, and more than 75% in the case of the others.
In absolute terms, the biggest figures are posted by companies in Motru and Bumbesti Jiu, with modest figures for the other centers of development. The city of Rovinari is also included in the category of high values.
A RON 2 million investment (with 50% foreign-capital contribution) is located on the premises of the Catunele settlement, inside the area of influence of the city of Motru.
If companies with foreign-capital contributions in Motru, Rovinari, Targu Jiu and Bumbesti Jiu are also considered, one notices they are concentrated along a northeast-southwest axis.
            A second axis, with a much more limited foreign-capital contribution rate, links the other secondary centers (Novaci, Targu Carbunesti, Ticleni, Turceni), along roughly a parallel direction.
            The data presented above allow for the following conclusions:
                        - the contribution of foreign capital to the establishment of companies is a fact in the case of secondary centers of development;
                        -   the concentration is higher in the Motru-Matasari-Catunele area;
                        - companies with foreign capital contributions stand out in the case of the city of Rovinari;
                        - in the case of the other centers of secondary growth, the interest of foreign capital is much limited, with the exception of the city of Bumbesti Jiu.
 
 
            Figure 4 The structure of equity in joint ventures in rural areas (2007)
 
Drafting a plan for local action to attract investments
(domestic and foreign).
  
            The suggested courses of action in order to attract investments in secondary centers of development are:
1.      Promoting their strengths during programs developed at county scale: energy resources, the quality of human resources, the presence of an entrepreneurial sector.
2.       The need for domestic and foreign investors’ creating SMEs that would take advantage of the local resources – human, natural, and socio-cultural capital and the modern technology – so as to develop into units able to cope with European-market competition, attractive for commercial banks, generating jobs and leading to the emergence of a well-off middle class.
3.      Attracting foreign investments by simplifying red tape, cutting down corruption, lowering taxation and granting incentives in certain strategic sectors or for profit reinvested in the local community.
4.      Setting up partnerships between secondary centers of development and their neighboring administrative units, with the goal of stimulating entrepreneurial initiatives, as well as implementing infrastructure-modernization projects, accessing of development funds included.
5.      Achieving cooperation between the county seat (Targu Jiu), as main center of development, and the secondary centers, matching the reevaluation of urban-rural and urban-urban ties.
  
  
  
Phase 2
  
            Introduction. The main goals of the second phase in 2009 of this project were as follows: Mapping the evolution of the SME sector at the level of settlements in Gorj county; identifying the changes that occurred in administrative systems as the result of the development of entrepreneurial initiative. The activities involved in achieving these goals concerned collecting data from local and regional authorities, drafting fieldwork forms for local authorities’ and company officials, as well as other sections of the population, field research to correct existing information and collect new information, diagnosing the current socio-economic situation of administrative units, analyzing the relations between the hierarchical position of human settlements and the use of local and regional economic resources.
 
1.        Mapping the evolution of the SME sector in settlements in Gorj county
The main economic development target of Gorj county’s development strategy is encouraging SMEs, so that gross domestic product per capita should reach the national mean average level, or no less than 95% of that value, in the wake of a diversification of economic activities by developing the SME sector, so that it should rise to the mean national average of 19.3 SMEs per 1,000 inhabitants, attracting foreign investments, so that they should reach at least 5% of all foreign direct investments in Romania and modernizing the educational and professional training systems so that they would produce a well-trained workforce, matching the demands of the market and modern technologies (The Gorj County Socio-Economic Development Strategy for 2007-2013, 2007).
Analyzing the relation between the development of administrative systems and entrepreneurial initiative was grounded in a complex set of indicators and processing forms submitted to authorities, entrepreneurs and inhabitants of the representative administrative units.
 
Table 1. The structure of the SME sector
 

Year
SME/1,000 inhabitants
Micro
Small
Medium
Primary sector
Secondary sector
Tertiary sector
2004
14.2
89.2
8.8
2.0
3.1
17.3
79.6
2005
14.7
93.9
5.3
0.8
2.4
19.4
78.2
2006
14.8
93.8
5.5
0.7
2.5
20.1
77.4
2007
15.7
94.1
5.1
0.8
2.6
20.9
76.5

                                                                                                              Source: The National Trade Registry Office, 2009
 
It can be noticed that the number of SMEs per 1,000 inhabitants registered a slight rise during the 2004-2007 interval, but fell short of the national mean average (19.4 in 2004 and 20.5 in 2007). As compared to the state of things in 2004, one can notice an upward trend in the number of SMEs and especially their multiplication in the production sector. The pace of creating new companies was partly influenced by changes in legislation concerning the establishment of small- and medium-sized companies – the National multiyear program for the development of entrepreneurship among women managers, the National multiyear program for 2005-2009 to support microenterprises and small enterprises’ access to training and consultancy services, the Program to modernize and develop sale of market services and products, among others.
The main problems among entrepreneurs are related to obtaining contracts, difficulties linked to requesting or offering them. As far as the offer is concerned, most new enterprises mainly face financial problems, especially lined to fund shortages, limited access to loans, the absence of customers or customers with payments on stand-by. As far as demand is concerned, entrepreneurs consider that the major problems are related to the limitations of competition on the retail market (77%), their company not being well-known enough (56%) and the absence of funds among potential customers (55%).
 
 
Figure 1. The distribution of enterprises in terms of the number of employees
 
 
 The distribution of enterprises in terms of employees highlights a predominance of microenterprises, as a result of government-promoted policies to encourage the entrepreneurial sector. Figure 1 presents the dependence of local economies on small and medium enterprises; in certain administrative units, they are the sole companies to contribute to the dynamics of the socio-economic system. The analysis of the Gorj county entrepreneurial sector highlighted the acute need for an intervention of decision-making authorities to support this sector, which faces a severe blockage because of the financial crisis. The detailed analysis of the structure of enterprises highlights the small- and medium-sized companies’ dependence on the large state-owned companies, which benefit from government support.
The dominant category in the county is that of companies with less than 9 employees. The majority of small enterprises are located in urban areas and in the northern part of the county. Medium-sized enterprises are located in the main cities (Motru, Rovinari, Targu Jiu) and in their areas of influence, while large enterprises are located in the city of Targu Jiu (where they make up for more than 23% of all enterprises) and in cities with mining-related industries (Motru, Rovinari).
            In terms of the number of employees, one can notice a clear domination of the county seat city, with more than 30,000 full-time employees; it also benefits from the presence of several large enterprises, in addition to 55 SMEs. The next positions in the classification went to the cities where the two large energy-generating complexes are located – Turceni and Rovinari, with 5,000 to 10,000 employees, and with a lower number of small and medium-sized companies – 28 and 23, respectively. Another category – 1,000 to 5,000 employees – comprises Motru, Bumbesti Pitic and Runcu, which can be explained by the mining industry in the case of the first city, and the services industry in the case of the other two; the number of SMEs tops 200 in Bumbesti Pitiic and 80 in Runcu. Localities with more than 400 to 1,000 employees include the towns of Târgu Carbunesti, Novaci and the villages of Dragotesti and Pades. If the situation can be explained in the case of the first three localities by the quite diverse nature of economic activities there, the situation of the fourth is mainly due to the development of tourist-service activities. Most settlements feature a number of employees lower than 100, which is the predominant situation in the south-eastern part of the county (Ionesti, Branesti, Stoina, Cruset, Stejari), and partially in the south-west (Samarinesti, Borascu, Bolbosi) and sporadically in the northern part (Sacelu, Balanesti).
 
 
Figure. 2 The distribution of the number of employees at administrative-unit level
 
 
Figure 3 The distribution of Romanian-capital companies in terms of fields of trade
 
            Romanian-capital companies make up for more than 90% of al enterprises. The tertiary sector is very well represented in the county, at various degrees depending on market demand and living standards. The secondary sector is present in the northern part of the sector and in urban centers. Investments in the primary sector are currently on a much more limited scale and are present in the north and south-east of the county (where they are linked to farming activities), as well as in areas with a mining tradition.
The distribution of profit made by small and medium companies at locality scale highlights significant differences in terms of location, with the highest values registered in cities and administrative units with large populations, an important factor in competition.
The highest values in profit made by SMEs is registered in the cities of Targu Jiu and Motru, which, thanks to their positions at county and region levels offer the best terms for the emergence and the development of small and medium companies.
The significant rise in profit for SMEs in rural areas, where the development of the land depends on this category of enterprises, is outstanding. It is interesting to notice that the ratio of SMEs rises in direct proportion with then isolation of the administrative unit from the main axes of structure; the profit made is therefore essential for the settlements’ economic development. This spatial layout indicates the SME’s importance for the economic recovery of areas plague by severe socio-economic imbalances. This situation is present in the townships of Samarinesti, Vagiulesti, Bolbosi, Negomir, Slivilesti, Ionesti, Stoina, Stejari, Danciulesti, Logresti, Berlesti, Sacelu, Bumbesti-Pitic, Câlnic.
Analyzing the distribution of Groj county’s SMEs’ profit emphasizes the importance of this category, complementary to the other types of companies, in the setting up of new centers of development that can contribute in the long run to the consolidation of a solid development network, interconnected with the larger socio-economic systems.
 
2.         Identifying the changes affecting the level of administrative systems as a result of the development of entrepreneurial initiative
 
            By July 1, 2008, Gorj county territory comprised 70 basic administrative units, including 9 towns and 61 villages, with a total 411 hamlets. As far as the towns are concerned, Târgu Jiu, the county seat, and Motru are labeled cities.
            A brief population analysis indicates an uneven distribution across the land; its size ranges from 1,285 inhabitants (the Arcani village) to more than 96,000 inhabitants (the city of Targu Jiu). Most townships have populations ranging from 3,000 to 10,000 inhabitants. One can also notice a high dispersion rate among the inhabitants, as each village is made up of 7 to 10 hamlets.
            One other feature worth emphasizing is related to urbanization rate. The urban population rate in the county stood at 47%. However, real urbanization levels are uneven, varying from 24% (Tismana) to 100% (Ticleni). The actual urbanization rate of the county seat stands at 95%.
            In the context of post-1990 political and economical changes, Gorj county underwent several alterations in its economic foundations, which influenced the functional and territorial structure of settlements and therefore the dynamic, structure and quality of the population’s living standards in this area, as reflected by the situation synthesized above.
              Disparities in the territory. The overall evolution of the current economic and political life, as well as the pre-1990 industrialization policy brought about imbalances in development from one region to another. Tempering these imbalances should be a task for the central administration, but also for county and local authorities, against the general background of the national policy for regional development, whose targets are:
  • cutting down on the existing regional disparities, with an emphasis on stimulating balanced development and incensing underprivileged areas (areas with delayed development), as well as preventing the occurrence of further disparities;
  • complying with criteria for integration in European Union structures and for access to financial assistance instruments for member countries (structural and cohesion funds);
  • timing to match the governmental development policies in various sectors; stimulating inter-regional, cooperation, both domestic and international, which contributes to economic development and complies with legal stipulations and the international agreements signed by Romania.
            Areas severely underprivileged in terms of demographics include 17 townships, with 11 of them concentrated in the northern part of the county. 5 of them feature demographic problems related to a 20% drop in population and 30% of the population aged 60 and older (Arcani, Capreni, Lelesti, Runcu and Sacelu). The other 12 townships (Novaci, Balanesti, Barbatesti, Bengesti Ciocadia, Berlesti, Branesti, Cruset, Farcasesti, Godinesti, Pestisani, Stanesti and Turcinesti) are characterize by 10-15% drops in the population during 1991-2005 and 25-30% of the population aged 60 and older.
            The synthesis concerning the Gorj county’s state of the economy, drawn using the previously listed indicators, highlights the existence of 23 townships that can be labeled as severely underprivileged areas, as they suffer from higher unemployment, low population occupancy rate and high dependence rate. 8 out of the 23 units are among the underprivileged areas declared in 1999. The synthetic analysis of the state of the economy does confirm the structure of the three areas (Albeni, Schela and Motru-Rovinari), with the addition of a fourth, in the southern part of the county, comprising the villages of Ionesti, Branesti, Tântareni, Stoina, Capreni and Vladimir.
            As far as the state of infrastructure is concerned, the areas that show up as severely underprivileged are the Motru-Rovinari area, the south-eastern part of the county, the Albeni area (located in the vicinity of the town of Targu Carbunesti), and the northwestern part of the county. The most important part in the delimitation of these areas was the underdevelopment of natural gas distribution and sewer networks, in addition to the absence of modern local road infrastructure.
            The combined analysis of the indicators presented indicated which areas are severely underprivileged in terms of living standards. The largest area is located in the southeastern part of the county. The others are the Motru Rovinari area and the northeastern part of the county (the mountain region).
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
Figure 4 The evolution of the development index 2000-2007
 
The development index was calculated by aggregating several categories of demographic indicators (population aging index, demographic evolution index), economic indicators (the number of companies, the number of employees), infrastructure indicators (length of the water supply network, the number of telephony subscriptions), living standards (infant mortality rate, the number of toilet-equipped dwellings)  The analysis of that map indicated a certain consistency (at high values of the index) in the case of the localities Motru, Matasari, Rovinari, Bumbesti-Jiu, Novaci, Turceni, Urdari, and a slight drop in Ticleni and Baia de Fier.
Low and dropping values were registered in the southwest and southeast regions (because of depopulation and demographic aging, limited entrepreneurial spirit, limited access to telecommunications and a high rate of population working in agriculture).
 
Conclusions
  
 
Although on an upward trend in the past few years, the SME sector currently registers a series of problems in the context of the current crisis of the economy. Subsequently, it is to be expected that, at least in the short run, both the number of SMEs and the number of their employees would register a significant drop.
The problems highlighted by form-filling indicate the idea that SMEs should be helped overcome the current period (as expressed by both the managers of these enterprises and local authorities) considering that they have a significant contribution to the economy of the region and especially to workforce absorption. This aid might come in the form of the program to develop entrepreneurial skills among the youth and easing their access to funding (START 2007).
Field data analysis indicates that the rate companies are closed down in less than a year after creation is higher in areas where the educational level of the managers is lower. This indicates the need for training current managers, in order to both cut down default instances, and raise the competitiveness of existing companies.
Previous experience indicates that local feedback is extremely important in the process of insertion of entrepreneurial initiatives. It an determine the success or failure of such an initiative. The interaction between the initiative and the space it unfolds in is shaped by means of the feedback of the latter’s elements.
 In terms of the intensity of changes induced, one can identify two types of entrepreneurial initiative insertion: some are slow and very hard to observe, while others are sudden and even violent. Slow insertion has the quality of being harmoniously integrated into a certain dynamic, altering the older structure. Violent insertion ruptures local structures, creates a new structure by destroying the older one and risks causing irreversible changes in the system in the respective region.
 As a general rule, the insertion of entrepreneurial initiative inside spatial coordinates considers: putting to best use local resources (natural and human), traditions or socio-economic and cultural niche sectors, a local context. All these are external elements and account for the implementation of a certain entrepreneurial initiative in a certain location in space.
Entrepreneurial initiative emerges out of a need to identify solutions to the problems in a community or to achieve targets set by the communities in various areas in space.
In the case of Gorj county, one can notice,
- the presence of limited economic activity in rural areas due to the following reasons: inefficient agriculture, lacking modern technology and equipment, the disappearance of certain traditional trades such as livestock breeding, limited level of entrepreneurial development in general and especially in rural areas, fewer SMEs than the national mean average, most of them in urban areas and in the service sector, rising unemployment, specially among the young and women, and a low foreign-investment attraction rate.
            - the development of the SME sector and new, environmental branches of the industry and the introduction of new innovative technologies is a slow process and does not yet act as a viable alternative to a thorough and massive reorganization of the county’s economic structure, in the near future.